000 | 00415nam a2200133Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c173452 _d173452 |
||
020 | _a9781847207524 | ||
040 | _cCUS | ||
082 |
_a344.04651 _bFAU/C |
||
245 | 0 |
_aChina and International environmental liability: legal remedies for transboundary pollution/ _cedited by Michael Faure, S. Ying |
|
260 |
_aCheltenham: _bEdward elgar, _c2008. |
||
300 | _a360 p. | ||
505 | _aPART I: INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND CONVENTIONS 2. Cluster-Litigation in Cases of Transboundary Environmental Harm Andre Nollkaemper 3. The Role of International Conventions in Solving Transboundary Pollution Disputes James Harrison 4. Transboundary Vessel-Source Marine Pollution - International Legal Framework and its Application to China Wang Hui5. ILC Proposal on the Role of Origin State in Transboundary Damage You HaiboPART II: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN A TRANSBOUNDARY LEGAL CONTEXT 6. Applying National Liability Law to Transboundary Pollution: Some Lessons from Europe and the United States Michael Faure and Gerrit Betlem 7. The Joint Governance of Transboundary River Basins: Some Observations on the Role of Law Marjan Peeters 8. A New Look at Environmental Impact Assessments: Using Customary Law to Prevent Domestic and Transboundary Environmental Damage Jack Jacobs 9. Transboundary Environmental Crimes: An Analysis of Chinese and European Law Thomas RichterPART III: THE SONGHUA RIVER POLLUTION CASE 10. Reflections from the Transboundary Pollution of Songhua River Wang Jin, Huang Chia Chen and Yan Houfu11. Pondering Over the Incident of Songhua River Pollution from the Perspective of Environmental Law Wang Canfa, Yu Wen-xuan, Li Dan and Li Jun-hong12. International Legal Aspect of the Songhua River Incident Song Ying PART IV: COMPARATIVE CONCLUSIONS 13. Comparative and Concluding Remarks Michael Faure and Song Ying | ||
700 | _a Faure, Michael (ed) | ||
700 | _aYing, S. (ed) | ||
942 | _cWB16 |