000			00292nam a2200121Ia 4500
999			_c159218 _d159218
020			_a9780895811400
040			_cCUS
082			_a294.3 _bRAN/F
245		0	_aFragments from Dinnaga/ _cedited by H.N.Randle
260			_aDelhi : _bMBP, _c1981.
300			_axii,93p. ; _c23cm.
440			_a Prize Publication Fund, 9.
505			_a1. Introductory 2. The Prarmryi-samuccaya 3. Fragment A. Definition of Perception 4. Vasubandhu's definition 5. Fragment B. manas as an organ of sense 6. Fragment C. Contact in vision 7. Fragment D. Criticism of the Vaiiefika doctrine of the per ceptibility of substance 8. Fragment E. Testimony not a separate source of know ledge 9. Fragment F. The probandum in an inference 10. Fragment G. Experience of an object inseparably connected with another is the instrument of inference 11. Fragment H. The threefold canon of syllogism 12. A septenary of types of syllogism 13. Va subandhu as a critic of the Nyaya 14. Fragment I. Definitions of (i) inference for another, anU (ii) proof 15. Fragment J. The Nine Types of syllogism 16. Fragment K. All middle terms are poi^a-dharvna 17. Fragment L. Criticism of the definition of hetu given in N3, I, i, 34. Uddyotakara's reply 18. Fragment M, Definition of a probans or valid middle term (the concept of vyapti) 19. Fragment N. ' Analogy' not a separate source of know ledge 20. Fragment O. The object of inference merely ideal 21. Fragment P. Definition of vada 22. Fragment Q. Criticism of the Vaiseika doctrine of the real universal
650			_a Buddhist literature.
700			_aRandle, H.N. ed.
942			_cWB16