Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Fragments from Dinnaga/ edited by H.N.Randle

Contributor(s): Randle, H.N. edMaterial type: Text

TextSeries: Prize Publication Fund, 9Publication details: Delhi : MBP, 1981Description: xii,93p. ; 23cmISBN: 9780895811400Subject(s): Buddhist literatureDDC classification: 294.3

Contents:

1. Introductory 2. The Prarmryi-samuccaya 3. Fragment A. Definition of Perception 4. Vasubandhu's definition 5. Fragment B. manas as an organ of sense 6. Fragment C. Contact in vision 7. Fragment D. Criticism of the Vaiiefika doctrine of the per ceptibility of substance 8. Fragment E. Testimony not a separate source of know ledge 9. Fragment F. The probandum in an inference 10. Fragment G. Experience of an object inseparably connected with another is the instrument of inference 11. Fragment H. The threefold canon of syllogism 12. A septenary of types of syllogism 13. Va subandhu as a critic of the Nyaya 14. Fragment I. Definitions of (i) inference for another, anU (ii) proof 15. Fragment J. The Nine Types of syllogism 16. Fragment K. All middle terms are poi^a-dharvna 17. Fragment L. Criticism of the definition of hetu given in N3, I, i, 34. Uddyotakara's reply 18. Fragment M, Definition of a probans or valid middle term (the concept of vyapti) 19. Fragment N. ' Analogy' not a separate source of know ledge 20. Fragment O. The object of inference merely ideal 21. Fragment P. Definition of vada 22. Fragment Q. Criticism of the Vaiseika doctrine of the real universal

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )
Comments ( 0 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode	Item holds
General Books	Central Library, Sikkim University General Book Section	294.3 RAN/F (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available		P14050

Total holds: 0

1. Introductory
2. The Prarmryi-samuccaya
3. Fragment A. Definition of Perception
4. Vasubandhu's definition
5. Fragment B. manas as an organ of sense
6. Fragment C. Contact in vision
7. Fragment D. Criticism of the Vaiiefika doctrine of the per
ceptibility of substance
8. Fragment E. Testimony not a separate source of know
ledge
9. Fragment F. The probandum in an inference
10. Fragment G. Experience of an object inseparably connected
with another is the instrument of inference
11. Fragment H. The threefold canon of syllogism
12. A septenary of types of syllogism
13. Va subandhu as a critic of the Nyaya
14. Fragment I. Definitions of (i) inference for another, anU
(ii) proof
15. Fragment J. The Nine Types of syllogism
16. Fragment K. All middle terms are poi^a-dharvna
17. Fragment L. Criticism of the definition of hetu given in
N3, I, i, 34. Uddyotakara's reply
18. Fragment M, Definition of a probans or valid middle term
(the concept of vyapti)
19. Fragment N. ' Analogy' not a separate source of know
ledge
20. Fragment O. The object of inference merely ideal
21. Fragment P. Definition of vada
22. Fragment Q. Criticism of the Vaiseika doctrine of the real
universal

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.