Judicial process and precedent/ (Record no. 190358)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 12481nam a2200133Ia 4500 |
| 020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER | |
| International Standard Book Number | 9789351452935 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
| Transcribing agency | CUS |
| 082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER | |
| Classification number | 347 |
| Item number | LAK/J |
| 245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Judicial process and precedent/ |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. | Lakshminath, A. |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Lucknow: |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Eastern Book Company, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2016. |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 567 p. |
| 505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
| Formatted contents note | 1. Judicial Process: A Prologue<br/>2. Precedent: A Prognosis<br/>3. "Stare Decisis" in the Indian Courts:<br/>Institutional Aspects<br/>4. "Stare Decidendi": A Sociological Perspective<br/>5. "Ratio Decidendi" and the Structure of Judgments<br/>6. Supreme Court and Overruling of Precedent . . . .<br/>7. Judicial Law-Making and Prospective Overruling<br/>8. Basic Structure Doctrine: Judicial Dynamics . . . .<br/>9. Lavs' Declared by the Supreme Court<br/>under Article 141<br/>10. Judicial Process and the Right to Life<br/>11. Death Sentence: Judicial Ambivalence<br/>12. Judicial Process and Personal Liberty<br/>13. Epilogue: Future of the Past<br/>Bibliography<br/>Subject Index<br/>XX JUDIC:iAl. PROC.'HSS AND I'RIX:!'DI N T<br/>Precedent: A Prognosis (contJ.)<br/>Difference between the doctrine of precedent<br/>and the doctrine of "res judicata"<br/>Background of the case<br/>Distinction between precedent and "res judicata'<br/>Nature of the jurisdiction under Article 14^<br/>3. Stare Decisis" in the Indian Courts: Institutional Aspects<br/>Introduction<br/>Influence of the decisions of the Privy Ciouncil on the<br/>evolution of precedents in Indian judicial practice<br/>Federal Court and the (jovernmcnt of India Act<br/>Precedent in post-independent India: Cionstitutional context<br/>Stare decisis" in India: Pre-Bengal immunity phase<br/>Judicial development of case law<br/>Precedents: Binding nature of "guidelines and norms" . . . •<br/>issuing guidelines: Comparison with<br/>"Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan"<br/>Shah Bano case": The Supreme C'ourt's interpretation<br/>of religious texts is binding precedent<br/>Directions as law ("Jain Hawala case")<br/>Selvi v. State of Karnataka<br/>Inconsistency between the "Vishaka case" and<br/>the "Selvi case" verdict<br/>Judicial directions cannot he annulled by an Act<br/>Binding effect<br/>Duty ()f the High Courts to assist the Supreme Court<br/>Judicial discipline<br/>Binding nature of improper order<br/>Directions and contempt of court<br/>Binding on tribunals<br/>Judicial power to expand statutory power<br/>"Resjud.cata" and binding nature<br/>ot directions<br/>Supreme Court opinions, Rhetoric perspective C k k k k<br/>Reporting a case as precedent<br/>Two decisions by equal Benches " ^ ^ ^ ^<br/>Jtidgments and representation<br/>Breach of judicial propriety ....<br/>"Stare Decisis" in the Indian Courts (etc.) (contd.)<br/>Precedent and "stare decisis"<br/>High Courts cannot overrule the Supreme Court's decisions<br/>4. "Stare Decisis"; A Sociological Perspective<br/>Sociology of "stare decisis"<br/>Ratio analysis<br/>"Waman Rao" and "stare decisis"<br/>Conclusion<br/>5. "Ratio Decidendi" and the Structure of Judgments<br/>Introduction: General observations<br/>"Ratio decidendi" as formulated by Lord Dunedin<br/>"Ratio" distinguished from "obiter"<br/>What is ratio<br/>"Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lai<br/>and the material fact method of ascertaining the<br/>"ratio decidendi"<br/>Sabhajit Tewary v. Union of India<br/>Authority of a decision for which no reasons are given<br/>What is an "authority"<br/>Complexities of the notion of "ratio decidendi<br/>Ratio of the "Delhi Laws case" as interpreted<br/>in the "Shama Rao case"<br/>Ratio of the "Delhi Laws case" restated: What is<br/>binding in a decision<br/>Theory of judicial decision and structure of judgment—general<br/>observations — the complexities of "Kesavananda Bharati" . .<br/>Precedential value of the "Kesavananda Bharati case"<br/>Status of the summary of "Kesavananda Bharati"<br/>"Indira Gandhi case": Ratio —How it is clarified<br/>by later decisions<br/>Amartnder Singh v. Punjab Vidhan Sabha<br/>(Privileges case)<br/>Clarification of the ratio of "Raja Ram Pal v. Lok Sabha"<br/>"Narrowing" the ratio: The lesbian, gay, bisexual and<br/>transgender (LGBT) verdict and its dilution<br/>"Stare decisis" and international law<br/>XXII JUDICIAL PROCESS AND PREC:EDEN I<br/>"Ratio Decidendi" and the Structure of Judgments (coiitd.)<br/>Material facts method of ascertaining "ratio decidendi"<br/>and judicial creativity: A critique<br/>CBSE V. Aditya BandopadhvLiy {RTI Clisc)<br/>"Maharashtra State Board" distinguished and<br/>its ratio clarified in the "RTI case"<br/>Comment<br/>State of Maharashtra v. Sangharaj Daniodar Rupawatc<br/>Julius Stone: Ratio of the "ratio decidendi"<br/>6. Supreme Court and Overruling of Precedent<br/>Judicial process and development of law<br/>What determines the quality of judicial process<br/>in any given society?<br/>Concept of social change<br/>Prof. Dworkin's framework: Arguments of principle and<br/>arguments of policy as a basis for rationalising judicial<br/>creativity<br/>Circumstances which favour overruling<br/>Overruling of precedent—Indian judicial experience:<br/>An overview<br/>"Gopalan case" overruled?<br/>State of Gujarat V. Vora Fiddali Badritddin Mithiharivala . .<br/>Director of Rationing and Distribution v. Corpn. of<br/>Calcutta overruled in "Supt. and Remembrancer of Legal<br/>Affairs V. Corpn. of Calcutta"<br/>"Basheshar Nath r;. CIT", "Deep Chand V. siate of U.P.",<br/>Jagannath v. Authorised Officer, Land Reforms" and<br/>"State of Gujarat v. Shri Ambica Mills Ltd."<br/>"Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co. v. Secy, of<br/>^^^te or India , State of Rajasthan v. Vidhyawati" and<br/>Kasturi Lai Ralia Ram Jain v. State of U.P."<br/>Recent trends in the concept of tortious liability of the State .<br/>Compensation<br/>Delegated legislation: "Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co.<br/>K r cri "M.K. Papiah & Sons v. Excise Commr."<br/>Kerala SEB v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd<br/>"Kesavananda Bharati case" and overruling<br/>of Golak Nath" .<br/>Supreme Court and Overruling of Precedent (contd.)<br/>"Golak Nath" decision and the overruling of a judicial<br/>precedent<br/>Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab<br/>Maganlal Chhaganlal (P) Ltd. v. Municipal Corpn. of<br/>Greater Bombay<br/>V. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddy<br/>1978 overrulings<br/>"Bangalore Water Supply case": Industrial<br/>Disputes Act, 1947<br/>"Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani": The thrust of<br/>the judicial activism<br/>Conclusion<br/>Overruling of precedent: "Supreme Court<br/>Advocates-on-Record Assn. case"<br/>Scope of convention<br/>Judicial appointments: The "Collegium vs.<br/>Commission" debate<br/>7. Judicial Law-Making and Prospective Overruling<br/>Prospective declaration of law<br/>"Golak Nath case" and the doctrine of prospective<br/>overruling<br/>Subbarao CJ's defence of the doctrine in the Indian context . . .<br/>Prospective overruling: Some theoretical considerations<br/>Prospective overruling m the American Constitution<br/>Cases in which the doctrine has been invoked in the American<br/>law and the theoretical justification therefore<br/>Objections to the prospective overruling<br/>Blackstonian theory: Separation of powers rationale and<br/>prospective overruling: Their relevance for an assessment of the<br/>judicial functions: Merits of prospective overruling<br/>Seervai on prospective overruling<br/>Prospective overruling in the Indian Constitution: Some<br/>criticisms answered<br/>P. Rajendran v. State of Madras<br/>Are judicial decisions hit by "Deep C.hand doctrine?<br/>XXIV JUDICIAL proc;e.ss and prf.cldhn r<br/>Judicial Law-Making and Prospective Overruling {contd.)<br/>Prospective overruling, "stare decisis" and acquiescence:<br/>An evaluation of their comparative merits in the context<br/>of the "Golak Nath case"<br/>Prospective overruling in non-constitutional context: "State of<br/>Kerala v. Alasserry Mohammed"<br/>Doctrine of prospective overruling<br/>Limits of retroactivity of law<br/>Prospective overruling: A modus vivendi: Ideological-cum-social<br/>policy facets of the problem in the setting of the<br/>"Golak Nath case"<br/>Prospective overruling and doctrine of moulding the relief:<br/>Article 142<br/>Equity as a necessary element or component of<br/>complete justice<br/>Restrictions on the exercise of powers under<br/>Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India<br/>Conclusion<br/>Article 142: Complete justice: "Ashok Kumar Gupta v.<br/>State of U.P."<br/>'K. Madhava Reddy i.. State of A.P.": Summing up the<br/>lan judicial approach to prospective overruling . . ,<br/>Facts of the case<br/>P" tive overruling; Avoiding a harsh and unfair result .<br/>8. Basic Structure Doctrine: Judicial Dynamics<br/>Conceptualising constitutionalism<br/>Contextualising a cross-cultural perspective . . . . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .<br/>To'ablXtr'' judicial reviewabsolute judicial supremacy<br/>Indian experience and experiment<br/>Judicial abdication<br/>"Cash for query" dash<br/>Basic structure doctrine reaffirmed<br/>9. Law Declared by the Supreme Court Under Article 141<br/>Interpretation of Article 141<br/>"State"; Precedential expansion<br/>Public enterprise<br/>Sukhdev Singh v. Bhagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi<br/>Statutory character<br/>Expansion of concept<br/>Major grounds of complaint against expansion<br/>Private enterprise as State<br/>Functional difference<br/>Functional theory<br/>Control test<br/>Human rights jurisprudence<br/>Societies as State<br/>Tekraj Vasandi v. Union of India<br/>Absence of "lis"<br/>"Other authorities" as "State<br/>Constitutional grounds<br/>Consequential grounds<br/>Conceptual grounds<br/>An appraisal<br/>Law declared under Article 141 and "ratio decidendi"<br/>of a case: Scope of Article 141 in its application to<br/>judicial precedents<br/>Multiple opinions and "ratio decidendi<br/>Haji Mohammed Din v. Narain Dass<br/>Binding effect of "obiter dictum"<br/>Status of "obiter dicta" under Article 141<br/>Legal position of "obiter dicta under Article 141:<br/>Case law considered<br/>Cases decided on concession, conflicting decisions<br/>and decisions "per incuriam<br/>Per incuriam<br/>Effect of a decision prospectively overruling a<br/>precedent under Article 141<br/>Advisory opinions<br/>XXVI JUDICIAL PR0C:KSS and I'RHCF.DI-N r<br/>Law Declared by the Supreme Court under Article 141 (contd.)<br/>Opinion of the Supreme Cioiirt in presidential reference cases and<br/>binding effect<br/>Natural Resources Allocation, re. Special Reference No. i<br/>of 1011 {Natural Resources case)<br/>Judgment rendered under Article 14U Whether precedent<br/>under Article 141?<br/>Nuances of Article 14^ of the Cionstitution<br/>President cannot refer a decided case<br/>Foreign decisions<br/>Decisions on questions of fact and decisions which involve<br/>judicial pronouncements about criminal sentence: A critique<br/>of Dalbir Singh v. State of Punjab"<br/>Sentencing jurisprudence in capital cases: American background<br/>and its relevance to India<br/>No jurisdictional embargo<br/>10. Judicial Process and the Right to Life<br/>Article 21 of Indian Constitution<br/>44th Amendment and Article 21<br/>Judicial activism<br/>Creation of various rights<br/>Right to livelihood<br/>Right to health<br/>without adequate protection to the workers<br/>pu ic are violative of Fundamental Rights<br/>Right to ecology and environment<br/>T U- ^ Fundamental Right under Article 21<br/>la an euthanasia: The poignant "Aruna Shanbaug Case" . .<br/>Right to education<br/>Judicial pronouncements<br/>Right of Children n<br/>Judicial interpretationTr f Act, aoo9<br/>transfotnta.iveconstrtnt.tm'atsm"<br/>Introduction<br/>11. Death Sentence: Judicial Ambivalence<br/>Existential debate: Death penalty<br/>and its constitutionality<br/>"Jagmohan" jurisprudence<br/>Article 19(1)<br/>Essential legislative powers argument<br/>Equality argument<br/>"Procedure established by law" argument<br/>"Rajendra Prasad case" and "conditional constitutionality" of<br/>the death penalty<br/>"Mithu case" and the "constitutionality of<br/>mandatory death sentence"<br/>"Bachan Singh case": Deliberative<br/>debate in the court<br/>Majority opinion: Sarkaria vie<br/>Bhagwati doctrine: Unconstitutional<br/>death sentence<br/>Caging the death sentence: The Supreme Court and<br/>its views on "standardisation of death penalty<br/>"Rajendra Prasad case" and the judicial restraint<br/>"Bachan Singh case" and the unanimity<br/>on non-acceptance of standards<br/>"Swamy Shraddananda case", "Sangeet case" and the<br/>observations against the "Machhi Singh" standardisation . . .<br/>Delay, inordinate delay and death penalty<br/>"Devender Bhullar" and "Shatrughan Chauhan case":<br/>Terrorism and commutation of death sentence<br/>"Audi alteram partem" and death penalty: Oral hearing vis-a-vis<br/>written submissions in review proceedings<br/>Conclusion<br/>12. Judicial Process and Personal Liberty<br/>Impact of judicial process on personal liberty<br/>Preventive detention and Article 21 after "Maneka Gandhi" .<br/>Due process of law<br/>XXVIII JUDICIAL PROCESS AND PRECEDENT<br/>Judicial Process and Personal Liberty {coutd.)<br/>Bail and personal liberty<br/>Right to free legal aid ^<br/>Right against solitary confinement<br/>Right to speedy trial<br/>Compensatory jurisprudence<br/>Power to award compensation under Article 32<br/>mpact of judicial process on right to privacy "in India<br/>Right to know .<br/>13. Epilogue: Future of the Past<br/>Overruling of recent precedent<br/>Freedom and flag<br/>Privacy rights<br/>Planned Parenthood of "Casey"<br/>Right to die<br/>Power to ov'er^rX^""^<br/>Judicial discipline and propriety .<br/>Lack of precedent consciousness<br/>Precedent and legal theory<br/>Bibliography<br/>Subject Index |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | AC Sinha Collection |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Full call number | Accession number | Date last seen | Date last checked out | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Library, Sikkim University | Central Library, Sikkim University | General Book Section | 15/09/2016 | 347 LAK/J | 044986 | 04/03/2024 | 07/02/2024 | General Books |