| Formatted contents note |
Introduction (Christophe Hillion and Panos Koutrakos) Part I. Typology of mixed agreements 1. Typology of mixed agreements (Marc Maresceau, Ghent) 2. Cross-pillar agreements (Ramses Wessel, Twente) Part II. The constitutional framework 3. Mixed Agreements Today (Christiaan Timmermans (Judge, ECJ, Luxembourg) 4. The jurisdiction of the ECJ to interpret mixed agreements (Panos Koutrakos, Bristol) 5. International responsibility from mixed agreements (Pieter-Jan Kuijper, Amsterdam) 6. The requirements of consistency and coherence (Christophe Hillion, Leiden) 7. Mixity and the federal principle (Robert Schutze, Durham) 8. Mixity in the era of the Reform Treaty (Alan Dashwood, Cambridge) 9. The Future of Mixity (Allan Rosas, Judge, ECJ, Luxembourg) Part III. The actors of mixed agreements 10. A view from the Commission (Frank Hoffmeister, European Commission) 11. A view from the Council (Czuczai Jeno, Council) 12. A view from the European Parliament (Ricardo Passos, European Parliament) 13. A view from Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Ivan Smyth, FCO) 14. A view from The Netherlands (Ivo van der Steen, MFA, The Hague) 15 A view from Norway (Henrik Bull, Judge, EFTA Court, Luxembourg) 16. A view from the State Department (Peter M. Olson, Department of State, US) Part IV. The practice of mixed agreements 17. Dispute settlement under mixed agreements and the autonomy of the EC legal order (Inge Govaere, Ghent and College of Europe) 18. Disconnection clauses (Marise Cremona, EUI) 19. The establishment of EC, EU and national positions under mixed agreements (Joni Heliskoski, Helsinki) 20. Mixity and the European Convention of Human Rights (Nanette Neuwahl, Montreal) Conclusion (Christopher Hillion, Panos Koutrakos) |
